Categories
Uncategorized

Selkirk McCoy: Hog Trial Traitor–or Real McCoy?

The feud fable is remarkable in many ways, not the least of which is the cavalier way it distorts the character of the people involved.  Lore and legend are repeated and given the stamp of “history,” leaving reputations in shambles with absolutely no real foundation.

Selkirk McCoy is branded a traitor to his McCoy family as a result of his vote on the jury in the hog trial.

Consider the presentation of Selkirk McCoy in two books, both published by the University of Kentucky Press, giving them the stamp of legitimacy.

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

The Stockholm Syndrome in Southern Appalachia?

The Stockholm Syndrome in Southern Appalachia?

When a hostage bonds with his/her captor, it is called “The Stockholm Syndrome.” Wikipedia says that it: “can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes “strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other.” Wiki further states that the FBI has found that roughly 8% of victims succumb to the syndrome.

What are we to make of a situation where a much larger percentage—possibly even a majority—of a population of a million or more exhibits evidence of having succumbed to the syndrome? I submit that this is precisely what we now see in the coal mining areas of Southern Appalachia.

West Virginia native Jeff Young wrote: “The key to understanding West Virginia is to recognize that it is less a fully functioning state government than a resource-extraction colony.”  http://grist.org/climate-energy/is-there-hope-for-west-virginia-as-it-moves-away-from-coal/

I have argued that the colonization was possible in the beginning and is maintained today only because the people of Southern Appalachia are perceived as deserving of colonial oppression.

North Carolina native, Betty Cloer Wallace wrote: “Appalachian mountain natives are the only group in America that many people still have the audacity to publicly ridicule as being ignorant—and worse.”  https://mountainx.com/opinion/050609fighting_back/

Historians trace the stereotype from Will Wallace Harney’s article “A Strange Land and a Peculiar People,” published by Lippincott’s Magazine in October 1873, through John Fox, Jr to Al Capp and television’s “Beverly Hillbillies.  I contend that, at least since 1888, the hillbilly stereotype rests mainly upon the story of the Hatfield and McCoy feud. In its “Hillbilly” entry, Wikipedia says: “Fueled by news stories of mountain feuds such as that in the 1880s between the Hatfields and McCoys, the hillbilly stereotype developed in the late 19th to early 20th century.” I agree.

Within a few days of entering graduate school at Cornell more than half a century ago, I was faced with this question from a fellow student from New York City: “What kind of people kill over a hundred of each other over a pig?”  When I objected to the characterization, he produced a copy of the New York Times article reporting the death of Cap Hatfield in 1930, which gave him all the documentation he needed. After all, it was in the nation’s “Newspaper of record.”

In my more than eighty years, I have never had anyone refer to Harney, Fox or Capp as support for their opinion of my people. It is always “the Feud!” I wrote in my 2013 book, “The Hatfield & McCoy Feud after Kevin Costner: Rescuing History: “The feud story was a creation of the big city newspapers.  The immediate purpose for its creation was to devalue the people and thereby facilitate the transfer of ownership of the wealth of the Valley to the same big city financiers who controlled those newspapers.  The ultimate purpose was to transform the independent mountaineers into docile and willing wage workers. This transformation was abetted by the state governments and the elites on both the state and local levels, who hoped to profit by the transformation.”

I show in my book that the story of the Hatfield & McCoy feud is, indeed, a story and not history, and that it was created and is maintained for the purpose of facilitating the continuing colonial oppression of the region.

Ms. Wallace ended her essay with: “We do have a choice. We can hasten our own cultural demise by doing nothing, by drawing a circle around ourselves and trying to shut out the rest of the world. Or… we can pick up our pine knots and go to war—to save ourselves.”

Unfortunately, a large percentage of my people have done the opposite of what Ms. Wallace urges us to do. The worst screed ever penned about my people—for reasons amply stated in my book—is the book by Dean King, which came out in the wake of the hit Kevin Costner TV mini-series.

Mr. King wrote in his book that the man responsible for overseeing 650,000 acres of West Virginia land for the largest absentee “colonizer” of West Virginia took two days out of his schedule to show Mr. King around the feud region.  Of course the land magnate’s time was not wasted, as the end result was a book that showed ALL the people of the feud area to be such low types that Mr. King’s stated “hero” of his story is the murderer of sleeping coal miners, Dan Cunningham.

When one looks at Mr. King’s Facebook page and sees the number of descendants of the people he maligns who are helping him to sell his massive libel of their ancestors, and, by extension, themselves, one sees the Stockholm Syndrome writ large.

The one that galls me most is a photo of King with descendants of Ellison Hatfield on his FB page, helping him sell his lies about their ancestor. King writes that Ellison Hatfield, one of the most respected men in Tug Valley, started the Election Day fight but drawing a knife on Tolbert McCoy.
Growing up on Blackberry in the 1940’s and ‘50’s,I heard the story of that fight from a dozen people who were eyewitnesses. I delivered the Williamson Daily News to the son of Preacher Anse who lived in Preacher Anse’s house from 1952-55. NO eyewitness, none of whom had a dog in the fight, placed a knife in Ellison’s hand. Not a single court record has a word of testimony placing a knife in Ellison’s hand. Yet, people directly descended from Ellison Hatfield help King sell that egregious lie about their ancestor.

If the pine knots are not taken up soon then the future is indeed bleak for such a people.

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum on the Web Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum

The West Virginia Encyclopedia on the Feud: Tilting at a Big Windmill

 

The Business Dictionary defines “Encyclopedia” as: “Single or multi-volume publication that contains accumulated and authoritative knowledge on one subject (such as an encyclopedia of architecture or music), a few related subjects (such as an encyclopedia of arts or engineering), or a wide variety of subjects arranged alphabetically (such as the Encyclopedia Britannica). Also spelled as encyclopaedia.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/encyclopedia.html

One usually expects to find “authoritative knowledge” about a subject in an Encyclopedia. An encyclopedia on history, such as “The Encyclopedia of American Biography,” normally presents facts supported by the historical record. When it comes to the Hatfield and McCoy feud, the West Virginia Encyclopedia fails miserably in its duty to inform the public of the historical facts contained in the actual records. The editors prefer the unsubstantiated tales of “feud writers” to the record, and I will prove it by examining the treatment of two men named “Vance” in the West Virginia Encyclopedia.

First, we have Abner Vance, the grandfather of Jim Vance and the great grandfather of Devil Anse Hatfield. The Encyclopedia says: “There are two founding events in Hatfield family history: A 1792 Shawnee raid in Russell County, which widowed Anna Musick and eventuated in her marriage to Ephraim, who was among the party that rescued her from the Indians. And in 1817, preacher Abner Vance fled a Russell County murder charge, finding refuge in Tug Valley. Vance later returned to Virginia and was hanged there, but not before establishing a family line on Tug Fork.” http://www.wvencyclopedia.org/articles/279

The paragraph is much better than most of the Encyclopedia’s feud information; the first half is actually true! The statement: “And in 1817, preacher Abner Vance fled a Russell County murder charge, finding refuge in Tug Valley. Vance later returned to Virginia and was hanged there, but not before establishing a family line on Tug Fork,” is correct ONLY in that Abner Vance was hanged. The rest of the statement is false in every detail, and the record proves it beyond any doubt.

The Encyclopedia repeats the offense in its article on Jim Vance, referring to Abner Vance as a “Tug Valley pioneer.” http://www.wvencyclopedia.org/articles/856

Abner Vance killed Lewis Horton in September, 1817. He was arrested soon afterwards, and spent every day until his hanging in jail. He never set foot in the Tug Valley. The Abner Vance story is reported in detail by Barbara Vance Cherep, the premier Vance researcher, in her article “Abner Vance: Two Sides to Every Story.” http://tgv7.tripod.com/index-12.html

Randy Marcum, a historian with the West Virginia Culture and History Department, gave a talk in July, 2012 wherein he used the research of Ms. Cherep to totally debunk the Abner Vance yarn presented in the West Virginia Encyclopedia.  http://youtu.be/C4fHENo67kM

In January, 2014, Ms. Cherep wrote Mr. Ken Sullivan, the editor of the Encyclopedia, challenging the treatment of Abner Vance, and offering to come to Charleston and show the editors the records on Abner Vance. Mr. Sullivan’s response is a glaring example of how the feud story is perpetuated by those who would normally be expected to adhere to the historical record; they absolutely refuse to even look at the record, and cling tenaciously to fables told by “feud writers,” with no actual foundation whatsoever. Mr. Sullivan wrote Ms. Cherep as follows:

“As for Abner Vance, that story has interested me for a long
time. The story as commonly presented is that about 1815 Vance killed
Horton while Horton was fording the Clinch River or in some versions
the Holston River. Vance then fled to Tug Valley where he sired the
line of Vances in that region. He returned to present Southwest
Virginia, however, was tried at Abingdon and hanged. Abingdon is the
county seat of Washington County, through which both forks of the
Holston River flow.  I believe Vance may have been tried and cleared in
Russell County, in the  Clinch River Valley, then later convicted and
hanged in neighboring Washington County. The story is probably best
known for the song that Abner wrote while awaiting execution. The Abner
Vance story interests us because it helps to root the Vances and
Hatfields in the early history of the region.”

The record shows this to be false in almost every detail. Vance killed Horton in 1817. Vance was arrested shortly thereafter, and spent every day until his hanging in jail. He never set foot in Tug Valley.

He was tried first in Russell County, as Mr. Sullivan says, but he was convicted and sentenced to hang. He appealed the verdict on the basis that the trial court erred in not allowing him to claim insanity as his defense. The appeals court set the verdict aside and ordered Vance tried again, allowing the insanity plea.

Unable to seat another jury in Russell County, due to the lack of available jurors whose minds were not already made up, the trial was moved to Washington County. Vance’s insanity plea was unsuccessful, and he was again convicted and sentenced to hang. The sentence was carried out in July, 1819.

Mr. Sullivan tells Ms. Cherep why he will not even look at her documentary evidence, and will continue to misinform the world about this history:

“The Abner Vance story interests us because it helps to root the Vances and Hatfields in the early history of the region.”

So, because the spurious Abner Vance yarn “helps to root the Vances…in the early history of the region,” Mr. Sullivan will continue to propagate the lie that Abner Vance absconded to the Tug Valley and founded a family there in his encyclopedia.

And he has the audacity to refer to it as “history.”

 

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

The New Year’s Raid: History versus Story

Where the Hatfield and McCoy feud is concerned, history is a story. It is, in fact, a conglomeration of stories by more than a dozen writers. A half dozen or so of those writers are designated as “historians” by the feud industry. There are no known standards by which the designation is made; one just knows that a given writer is a “historian” when feud industry approved writers refer to him/her as a “feud historian.”

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Dean King Hokum Uncategorized

The Library of Virginia’s “People’s Choice” Writer Survives Ambush in Feud Country—Twice!

 

Two thirds of Mingo County, West Virginia is owned today by five out-of-state coal and land companies. The Forestland Group controls over three and one half million acres of land in the US. Seven Hundred twenty-three thousand acres are in West Virginia and Kentucky. As the map shows, it is not a great overstatement to say that they “own West Virginia.”  http://www.forestlandgroup.com/about.html

forestland

From the company’s website, we see:

Craig R. Kaderavek
Senior Director of Forest Operations-Appalachian Region

 

According to Dean King, Mr. Kaderavek and one of his associates (p.348) took the intrepid explorer/writer on a tour of the Valley in the summer of 2009. At the mouth of Thacker Creek, the group was fired upon by the barbaric descendants of the feudists. (p.xii)

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

 

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum

Library of Virginia’s “People’s Choice Award” Won by a Fraudster

The Library of Virginia’s 2014 People’s Choice Award for non-fiction has gone to a book that is probably the biggest literary hoax since Clifford Irving’s bogus “Autobiography of Howard Hughes” more than forty years ago.

This is the first in a series of posts I will make which will prove conclusively—by the record—that Dean King’s “The Feud: The Hatfields and McCoys, The True Story” is one of the biggest collections of falsehood ever sold as non-fiction.

If I covered all of King’s distortions of the record and outright lies, this series would be longer than King’s four hundred thirty page book; therefore, I will cover only a dozen or so of the most egregious examples of the perfidy of this “historian.”

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

 

Categories
Uncategorized

“Crazy Jim” Vance: Summing Up

You can tell very quickly if you are reading something about Jim Vance that was written by a “feud story” writer and not a historian. Feud story writers always include accusations of criminality against Vance.  All of the accusations originated AFTER Vance was murdered.

The posthumous criminal accusations all originated with the men who raised and led the gang that murdered Vance.  None of the feud story writers ever produces any real evidence of any of the purported criminal activity.

On the other hand,, feud story writers NEVER mention ANY of the salient facts about James Vance.

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

Categories
Uncategorized

We Don’t Get No Respect!

We Don’t Get No Respect!

[Thomas, through his books and blog and social media posts, has long been a champion of historical truth when it comes to the feud era and its people.  He is also, however, a champion of the Appalachian people in general.  The newspaper writing in the immediate wake of the raid on the McCoy home was devastating in the long-term effects it had upon how mountain people were perceived by the broader American public.  These articles, whose writers for the most part knew they were false the moment they wrote them, painted an image of mountain people for audiences in Pittsburgh, Boston, New York, etc. as rough and dirty savages, half-crazed on moonshine and eager to shoot each other down over the most trifling of events.  Few people knew, or cared to know, that this region was in fact a place where, other than during the years of the Civil War, murder was almost unknown.  The people were, as Altina Waller  correctly described them, rough and tumble, but far from being lawless gunslingers they were in fact quick to take even relatively small issues to court.  And, in case after case that Thomas has examined in the documents, people complied with the judgements of the court.  The records are clear that the people of the Tug Valley, at least prior to the coming of the railroads and coal companies, displayed an enormous respect for the law.  –RH]

Several of my friends and relatives have asked me why I devoted many months of my life to writing a “feud book,” at a time when my life expectancy could be numbered in months. I thought I had made that clear in my introduction, where I wrote: “The feud story was a creation of the big city newspapers.  The immediate purpose for its creation was to devalue the people and thereby facilitate the transfer of ownership of the wealth of the Valley to the same big city financiers who controlled those newspapers.   The ultimate purpose was to transform the independent mountaineers into docile and willing wage workers. This transformation was abetted by the state governments and the elites on both the state and local levels, who hoped to profit by the transformation.”

At the end of the book I wrote: “I believe that there was a purpose for sending the New York reporters to our area instead of to the other parts of Kentucky where much larger feuds were underway.  The purpose was to present the people of the Tug Valley as semi-savage barbarians, thus rendering the taking of their mineral riches more palatable to the American public.”

I also wrote that I believe the recent revival of the feud story, in an even more super-sized form, leads me to believe that the public is being prepared for the destruction coming soon from the fracking of the Marcellus shale, which underlies over 90% of West Virginia.

Betty Cloer Wallace made my points much better than I can in a column she wrote for an Asheville, North Carolina paper five years ago.

https://mountainx.com/opinion/050609fighting_back/

The column was Ms. Wallace’s response to one of Bill O’Reilly’s “pseudo-smart” monologues on the subject of hillbillies, and an atrocious cartoon carried in that same paper. The cartoon:

Ms. Wallace wrote: “Bill O’Reilly’s recent denunciation of Appalachian-Americans on FOX News is only the latest example of the widespread, multigenerational problem of Appalachian hillbilly stereotypes. Quite simply, O’Reilly once again reminded the world that Appalachian mountain natives are the only group in America that many people still have the audacity to publicly ridicule as being ignorant—and worse.

“O’Reilly even expanded the historical litany of hillbilly stereotypes to include our being drug-addicted, hopelessly beyond social and moral redemption, and unworthy to live in our own mountain homeland. Appalachian children, he says, should move to Miami to save themselves….

“How can we overcome the pervasive hillbilly stereotypes that have demoralized us for more than a century and that continue to impact both our economic well-being and our children’s future? Why are we so reluctant to pick up pine knots and go to war against such blatant, insidious misrepresentation of our culture? Why do we continue to pull in our heads like turtles and pretend that we don’t care, that we’ll survive regardless of what the outside world thinks?

Well, I do care—for myself, my family and friends, and my culture—and I don’t believe we’re surviving very well now or will survive with a shred of honor and dignity in the future unless we rise up, en masse, and protest this kind of abuse at every opportunity.”

The following quotes from Ms. Wallace are gleaned from several of her responses to comments following the article.

“Yes, O’Reilly himself is small potatoes, merely a media mouthpiece and irritant, but thousands of people worldwide do believe him and others of his kind, and therein lies the problem with our future and the future of our children and grandchildren–if we do not pick up our pine knots and go to war to stamp out this terrible misrepresentation of our culture.

“This isn’t about our own perception of ourselves. We know who we are. It’s about how the rest of the world — encouraged by entertainment media and assorted other opportunists — have scapegoated us and continue to ridicule us while we just roll over and play dead or pretend we are “proud” to be deemed stupid and worse, as per that denigrating cartoon referenced above. Ultimately we bequeath these injustices and economically crippling stereotypes to our children, who deserve better. Other groups have gone to war to stamp out such negative racial and ethnic and cultural stereotypes, and they have succeeded in making it politically incorrect to produce bad movies and insulting cartoons or even to speak grossly insensitive language such as “step-n-fetchit,” “nigger,” “injun,” “dago:” need I go on? We should demand respect for ourselves and for our children.”

As some well-known politicians, who don’t really believe it say, “It really is all about the children”–and generations yet unborn

Reporting on a conference she attended, Wallace wrote: “The professor actually agreed with me, but the other participants did not want to hear that. They wanted to talk about feudists and snake-handlers and lawless heathens skulking around in the mountain fastnesses—and how such people were surely still around if only they could root them out and meet them.”

For a century and a quarter those outside writers failed to “root them out and meet them.” In 2013, Dean King finally did it, with his ludicrous yarn about how he and his teenage daughter, along with two forest rangers, were fired upon TWICE, in 2009 and 2010.

Wallace further says: “Ultimately EVERYONE who lives here, native or otherwise, is damaged with such blatant stereotypes that hinder the positive growth and reputation of the region…. Further compounding the problem, too many of our local governments are now made up of second-rate pseudo-leaders who are interested primarily in promoting tourism at any cost. But who, we might ask, will own the new hotels and mountaintop second-homes and assorted eateries the appointed tourist boards and self-serving chambers of commerce say we need—and who will be paying increased taxes for infrastructure to support them, and who will be cleaning their rooms and waiting their tables and manicuring their lawns?

Southern Appalachian people have tried to overlook blatant cultural stereotypes for over a century to no avail. Trying to ignore the insult and taking a “step-n-fetchit” response has reinforced it and perpetuated it in the minds of so many people that they think it is all right to continue the insult.

Simply ignoring it and allowing it to continue in such a blatant manner is an awful legacy of submission to leave to our children and grandchildren.”

In the year since my book came out, I have discovered that the “step-n-fetchits” greatly outnumber the people who are willing to take up a pine knot and go to war for themselves and their posterity.

 

 

Categories
Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum Real Hatfield-McCoy History

“Crazy Jim” Vance: Part 2

Some feud story writers try to justify the murder of Jim Vance on the basis that his killers knew that he had led the New Year’s raid, and were therefore simply unable to restrain themselves when they came upon the man responsible for burning the McCoy home and killing two innocent people. Dean King lays that allegation to rest when he says of the Phillips gang: “None of them had any idea that Jim Vance was even involved in the house burning (let alone that he led it).”[i]

When a writer who has called the man “Crazy Jim” for one hundred sixty-five pages makes such a startling admission, a reader should pay attention.

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

 

 

 

[i] Governor Simon B. Buckner Papers, Folder 4, February 6, 1888.

[ii] Charles Gillespie was quoted in newspapers as saying that Mounts clubbed Sally, while Mounts’ confession says that Johnse Hatfield clubbed Sally. Sally, in her testimony, did not say who bludgeoned her, but Mr. King says that it was his fictional “Crazy Jim.”

[iii] King Dean, The Feud, 177-78.

[iv] New York Sun, October 21, 1888, p.8.

[v] King, Dean, 73-4.

[vi] Hugh Toney, Floyd Hatfield, J.R. Browning and P.H. Dingess all signed a bond for $2,500 guaranteeing Vance’s good conduct in office. That is equal to $150,000 in gold today. Logan County Court Orders, 1883, p. 394.

 

[i] King, 202.

[ii] Governor Simon B. Buckner Papers, Folder 3, January 13, 1888.

Categories
Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum Real Hatfield-McCoy History Uncategorized

More Feud Markers for West Virginia

Until recently, West Virginia had no markers for feud events on the West Virginia side of the Tug River. Bill Richardson has started to rectify that deficiency by placing markers at sites where “feud events” occurred, or where feud characters lived.

Bill Richardson is a student of history, and it shows in the markers he has placed. Richardson’s markers adhere closely to actual historical fact, and, as a result, might not be as effective in drawing tourists as are the ones in Kentucky.  The super-sized feud story evident in the Kentucky markers, based largely on the feud fable as it is presented in the feud books, is much more titillating than are the historical markers being erected in West Virginia.

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy