Categories
Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum

Tug Valley Topography Kills the Feud Story

 

For years I have challenged anyone to show me a single location in the feud area where a man could have had a farm located where an assassin could not get within fifty yards of him as he went about his daily chores. No one has done so, but many still contend that those mountain hunters were out to kill each other for a generation.

I have personally hunted over most of the area between the homes of Ran’l McCoy and Devil Anse Hatfield, so I know whereof I speak.

The feud yarn is a crock, and the map proves it.

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

What’s the Difference Between a Feud Yarn and Real History?

The first sentence in Chapter one of G. Elliott Hatfield’s book is: “Of all the famous feuds that have been fought in the mountain country of the United States, probably no other has equaled the famous Hatfield and McCoy feud in deadliness, in duration, and in desperateness of conflict.”

The first sentence in Dean King’s second chapter is: “A blood feud in the vein of the Hatfields versus the McCoys…is essentially a state of warfare between two families.”

L.D. Hatfield wrote (p. 26): “The uppermost thing in the minds of those on either side was the extermination of the enemy.”

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

Categories
Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum Uncategorized

The Message of the Battle of Grapevine

Everyone who is descended from ancestors who lived in the Tug Valley during the quarter century following the Civil War will eventually face the same question that I was asked the first week I was in graduate school in New York, which is: “What kind of people kill a hundred of each other over a pig?”

The real genius of Altina Waller was that she laid the foundation for an answer to that question. Her greatest contribution was that she saw that what she called the “Second phase” of the feud (December 1887-January, 1888) had nothing to do with pigs or love affairs or moonshine whiskey. Waller found the records showing that once Devil Anse sold his Grapevine lands and moved two ridges away from the Valley, there was no more “feud.”

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum on the Web

West Virginia’s Tax Dollars at Work on the Hatfields and McCoys

The West Virginia Encyclopedia is extremely damaging to the study of real history, simply because it has the State’s imprimatur upon it. We saw the lack of concern for the historical record in my blog post a few months ago on the Encyclopedia’s handling of the Abner Vance story.  http://hatfield-mccoytruth.com/2014/11/24/the-west-virginia-encyclopedia-on-the-feud-tilting-at-a-big-windmill/

In response to an inquirer who offered to bring the documentary proof that the Encyclopedia’s article was in error, the editor said he didn’t need to see the evidence, because he liked the story and would leave it the way it was.

Surfing the net for “feud” stuff the other day, I again ran into the “Devil Anse had a guerrilla group that was known as The Logan Wildcats” claim. Of course anyone who has studied the real history knows that the Logan Wildcats were Company D of the 36th Virginia Infantry, and they never operated within a hundred miles of Tug River. Devil Anse was never a member of the Logan Wildcats, much less their leader. The writer, like most recent writers making that spurious claim, cited the West Virginia Encyclopedia.

What makes it doubly sad is that the writer undoubtedly thought he/she was writing history, simply because it came from a website with the name “West Virginia Encyclopedia” at the top of the page. Anyone who took the trouble to check the writer’s sources would have been doubly reassured when he looked at the Encyclopedia’s article, because it has this at the bottom:

Cite This Article: Spence, Robert Y. “Logan Wildcats.” e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopedia. 07 October 2010. Web. 10 March 2015.

The West Virginia Encyclopedia says that Devil Anse was the leader of the Logan Wildcats, and its source was the historian, Robert Spence; therefore, who can blame a researcher with no prior knowledge for accepting it as gospel? The blame lies with the Encyclopedia, not with the honest researcher who accepts what the Encyclopedia says as history, and here is why:

Robert Spence was the co-author of a book with Coleman Hatfield called “The Tale of the Devil.” That book, first published in 2003, has some 25 pages about Devil Anse and the Civil War. About half of it concerns the Logan Wildcats, which Spence and Hatfield never say was the name of Devil Anse’s guerrilla band.   All of their writing about Anse and the Logan Wildcats refers to the real Logan Wildcats, Company D of the 36th Infantry, but the name of Anderson Hatfields never appears on a muster roll for the Logan Wildcats.

There is not a single sentence in the long chapter which says that Devil Anse’s raiders during the last part of the war were known as the Logan Wildcats. Surely if it had been true, the authors would not have let such a colorful name slip by, but they never once said that Anse’s home guard was known as the Logan Wildcats. They confined the moniker to its real application throughout.

Of course this brings us to the question of why did Spence write in the Encyclopedia that Anse’s band of Tug River raiders was known as the Logan Wildcats, when he did not say it in The Tale of the Devil.

The Encyclopedia tells us to cite the article as being by Robert Spence, with a date of October 7, 2010.  I can hear my readers shouting at me: “That settles it, Dotson. Now shut your mouth!”

“Not so fast,” I respond. “Look at the date.”

Robert Spence died in 2005, but the Encyclopedia wants us to ascribe something to him that was written in 2010. Something smells about this. I am no expert on West Virginia’s Civil War units, but from what I know, the first two paragraphs of that article are correct, and were probably written by Robert Spence.

The last paragraph about Logan Wildcats along the Tug is pure Hatfield-McCoy hokum, and was likely added after Spence died—it is so dated—dishonestly retaining the claim that it was all written by Robert Spence. The editor of the Encyclopedia is obviously careful to edit his Encyclopedia to keep it up-to-date with the latest tale in the latest feud book put out by the feud industry.  As he proved when confronted about Abner Vance, he does not give a hoot in hell for our real history.

Shame, shame, Mr. Editor. You are destroying the credibility of something that the taxpayers of West Virginia are paying for. You have most likely not heard the last of it.
PS: At my age, most of my readers will outlive me by at least a decade or so. If someone tells you that I wrote something five years after I died, please do NOT believe it!

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us!

We Southern Appalachians are the only demographic group that can be publicly insulted with impunity in this politically correct twenty-first century. This will continue to be the case so long as Southern Appalachians continue to aid in the promulgation of lies about themselves and their ancestors.

The most damaging lie about our people is the Hatfield and McCoy feud story. I am not referring to the actual history of the two families, which is not really remarkable for violence in the context of late nineteenth century frontier America.  The problem is the story, which is largely false.

The Hatfield and McCoy feud story, whether in the slimmed down forty-page versions of John Spears and Shirley Donnelly, or in the super-sized four hundred page version of Dean King, is not true. In fact it is false in so many of its material claims—as my own books clearly prove–that it must be considered a lie on the whole.

I despise the feud tales, and I have a very good reason to do so: Every lie in every feud tale makes my ancestors look evil and barbaric. There is not a single lie in any feud book that makes them look more sane and civilized.

I use the term “lie” deliberately, to refer to material misrepresentations of fact which the writer either knew or should have known was false when he wrote it. I am not talking about simple errors like a wrong date or the confusion of similar names—the kind of mistakes every writer makes.

The feud lie, which presents ALL of our ancestors—and, by extension, all of us– as stupid and bloodthirsty cowards, is spread by three types of Appalachians:

First, there are those who believe that the super-sized feud yarn will attract tourists to an area that is virtually in its economic death throes. I try to be as kind as possible to these misguided kinsmen who honestly believe that it is profitable to be dishonest.

They can and must be approached with the power of the truth. Our real history, properly presented, would attract just as many tourists as does the feud lie.

The second group is comprised of folks who just don’t know any better. They need a history lesson or two.

The third group of home-grown aiders and abettors of the feud liars is not approachable on the same basis. Comprised of people who are enamored with the idea of being descended from pathological killers, this group is beyond reason. Rational arguments based on historical facts have no effect on these people. They will help sell a feud book that they frankly admit is false in many material particulars, so long as it presents their ancestors as bloody savages.

pogoClick on graphic to enlarge.

I am sure that most people reading this have seen Dean King’s Facebook page, which features many members of the third group.

The most egregious of the many lies in King’s book says that Ellison Hatfield started the Election Day fight by drawing a knife on Tolbert McCoy. That means that Ellison, called “a splendid man and soldier” in the definitive McCoy story by Truda McCoy, was a would-be murderer, who got only what was coming to him when the McCoys butchered him. By extension, Devil Anse was nothing but a cold-blooded murderer when he executed the three innocent McCoys.

Yet, we see direct descendants of Ellison and Devil Anse pictured with King, helping him sell his lies about their ancestors.

Of course the same lie makes Preacher Anse Hatfield a willing accessory to the triple murder of the three McCoys, but that does not keep descendants of Preacher Anse from giving the book rave reviews.

The best thing about Jim McCoy in the book is the ridiculous claim that he worked for Devil Anse at Anse’s moonshine still, at a time when a vicious blood feud between the two families was underway.  Yet, some descendants of Jim McCoy laud the book.

Asa Harmon McCoy, a warrior to the bone—by the record—is a coward who deserts his home and hides out in a cave. Yet direct descendants of Asa Harmon are shown on King’s Facebook page, grinning from ear to ear as they help him pitch his lies.

The best depiction of any Hatfield or McCoy in King’s screed is of Ran’l McCoy. He is simply a victim. There is not a single laudatory word about Ran’l or any other McCoy in the four hundred plus pages of the book. Yet King has no shortage of McCoys plugging his book.

This third group of Hatfields and McCoy descendants is beyond the reach of rational argument. Any time spent trying to enlighten them is utterly wasted.

 

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum on the Web Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum

The West Virginia Encyclopedia on the Feud: Tilting at a Big Windmill

 

The Business Dictionary defines “Encyclopedia” as: “Single or multi-volume publication that contains accumulated and authoritative knowledge on one subject (such as an encyclopedia of architecture or music), a few related subjects (such as an encyclopedia of arts or engineering), or a wide variety of subjects arranged alphabetically (such as the Encyclopedia Britannica). Also spelled as encyclopaedia.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/encyclopedia.html

One usually expects to find “authoritative knowledge” about a subject in an Encyclopedia. An encyclopedia on history, such as “The Encyclopedia of American Biography,” normally presents facts supported by the historical record. When it comes to the Hatfield and McCoy feud, the West Virginia Encyclopedia fails miserably in its duty to inform the public of the historical facts contained in the actual records. The editors prefer the unsubstantiated tales of “feud writers” to the record, and I will prove it by examining the treatment of two men named “Vance” in the West Virginia Encyclopedia.

First, we have Abner Vance, the grandfather of Jim Vance and the great grandfather of Devil Anse Hatfield. The Encyclopedia says: “There are two founding events in Hatfield family history: A 1792 Shawnee raid in Russell County, which widowed Anna Musick and eventuated in her marriage to Ephraim, who was among the party that rescued her from the Indians. And in 1817, preacher Abner Vance fled a Russell County murder charge, finding refuge in Tug Valley. Vance later returned to Virginia and was hanged there, but not before establishing a family line on Tug Fork.” http://www.wvencyclopedia.org/articles/279

The paragraph is much better than most of the Encyclopedia’s feud information; the first half is actually true! The statement: “And in 1817, preacher Abner Vance fled a Russell County murder charge, finding refuge in Tug Valley. Vance later returned to Virginia and was hanged there, but not before establishing a family line on Tug Fork,” is correct ONLY in that Abner Vance was hanged. The rest of the statement is false in every detail, and the record proves it beyond any doubt.

The Encyclopedia repeats the offense in its article on Jim Vance, referring to Abner Vance as a “Tug Valley pioneer.” http://www.wvencyclopedia.org/articles/856

Abner Vance killed Lewis Horton in September, 1817. He was arrested soon afterwards, and spent every day until his hanging in jail. He never set foot in the Tug Valley. The Abner Vance story is reported in detail by Barbara Vance Cherep, the premier Vance researcher, in her article “Abner Vance: Two Sides to Every Story.” http://tgv7.tripod.com/index-12.html

Randy Marcum, a historian with the West Virginia Culture and History Department, gave a talk in July, 2012 wherein he used the research of Ms. Cherep to totally debunk the Abner Vance yarn presented in the West Virginia Encyclopedia.  http://youtu.be/C4fHENo67kM

In January, 2014, Ms. Cherep wrote Mr. Ken Sullivan, the editor of the Encyclopedia, challenging the treatment of Abner Vance, and offering to come to Charleston and show the editors the records on Abner Vance. Mr. Sullivan’s response is a glaring example of how the feud story is perpetuated by those who would normally be expected to adhere to the historical record; they absolutely refuse to even look at the record, and cling tenaciously to fables told by “feud writers,” with no actual foundation whatsoever. Mr. Sullivan wrote Ms. Cherep as follows:

“As for Abner Vance, that story has interested me for a long
time. The story as commonly presented is that about 1815 Vance killed
Horton while Horton was fording the Clinch River or in some versions
the Holston River. Vance then fled to Tug Valley where he sired the
line of Vances in that region. He returned to present Southwest
Virginia, however, was tried at Abingdon and hanged. Abingdon is the
county seat of Washington County, through which both forks of the
Holston River flow.  I believe Vance may have been tried and cleared in
Russell County, in the  Clinch River Valley, then later convicted and
hanged in neighboring Washington County. The story is probably best
known for the song that Abner wrote while awaiting execution. The Abner
Vance story interests us because it helps to root the Vances and
Hatfields in the early history of the region.”

The record shows this to be false in almost every detail. Vance killed Horton in 1817. Vance was arrested shortly thereafter, and spent every day until his hanging in jail. He never set foot in Tug Valley.

He was tried first in Russell County, as Mr. Sullivan says, but he was convicted and sentenced to hang. He appealed the verdict on the basis that the trial court erred in not allowing him to claim insanity as his defense. The appeals court set the verdict aside and ordered Vance tried again, allowing the insanity plea.

Unable to seat another jury in Russell County, due to the lack of available jurors whose minds were not already made up, the trial was moved to Washington County. Vance’s insanity plea was unsuccessful, and he was again convicted and sentenced to hang. The sentence was carried out in July, 1819.

Mr. Sullivan tells Ms. Cherep why he will not even look at her documentary evidence, and will continue to misinform the world about this history:

“The Abner Vance story interests us because it helps to root the Vances and Hatfields in the early history of the region.”

So, because the spurious Abner Vance yarn “helps to root the Vances…in the early history of the region,” Mr. Sullivan will continue to propagate the lie that Abner Vance absconded to the Tug Valley and founded a family there in his encyclopedia.

And he has the audacity to refer to it as “history.”

 

Categories
Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum Real Hatfield-McCoy History

“Crazy Jim” Vance: Part 2

Some feud story writers try to justify the murder of Jim Vance on the basis that his killers knew that he had led the New Year’s raid, and were therefore simply unable to restrain themselves when they came upon the man responsible for burning the McCoy home and killing two innocent people. Dean King lays that allegation to rest when he says of the Phillips gang: “None of them had any idea that Jim Vance was even involved in the house burning (let alone that he led it).”[i]

When a writer who has called the man “Crazy Jim” for one hundred sixty-five pages makes such a startling admission, a reader should pay attention.

This story can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://tinyurl.com/ycqlg3oy

 

 

 

[i] Governor Simon B. Buckner Papers, Folder 4, February 6, 1888.

[ii] Charles Gillespie was quoted in newspapers as saying that Mounts clubbed Sally, while Mounts’ confession says that Johnse Hatfield clubbed Sally. Sally, in her testimony, did not say who bludgeoned her, but Mr. King says that it was his fictional “Crazy Jim.”

[iii] King Dean, The Feud, 177-78.

[iv] New York Sun, October 21, 1888, p.8.

[v] King, Dean, 73-4.

[vi] Hugh Toney, Floyd Hatfield, J.R. Browning and P.H. Dingess all signed a bond for $2,500 guaranteeing Vance’s good conduct in office. That is equal to $150,000 in gold today. Logan County Court Orders, 1883, p. 394.

 

[i] King, 202.

[ii] Governor Simon B. Buckner Papers, Folder 3, January 13, 1888.

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Perry Cline–The Man–Hatfield and McCoy Feud

The two most misrepresented of all the feud characters are James Vance, whom we covered in an earlier post, and Perry A. Cline.

The treatment of Perry Cline by the feud writers is as atrocious as is that of Jim Vance. As in the case of Vance, the picture of Cline painted by the yarn-spinners is a mixture of ignorance and lies.  The historical Perry Cline was far more different from the one the feud writers portray than Ronan Vibert is from the real Perry Cline.

PACreal

There is a lot of Cline history that does not appear in the feud stories. Here is a small part of it.

This photo is a Pike County Court document from December, 1874, showing Perry Cline becoming Sheriff of Pike County, at the age of 25. His bond was signed by the two wealthiest men in the county, O.C. Bowles and John Dils. Dils and Bowles were Republicans, and Cline was a Democrat. Dils was also foster father to Perry Cline.

Click the thumbnails to expand them.

I know it will shock people who know nothing but what they have read in the feud tales, but the third signer of Perry Cline’s bond was none other than his close friend, James Vance. The feud yarns tell us that Perry Cline thought that James Vance murdered Cline’s brother-in-law, Asa Harmon McCoy in 1865. This record shows that Perry Cline and James Vance were the closest of friends ten years later. Does any sentient human being think that Perry Cline had a man sign his sheriff’s bond whom he thought had murdered his sister’s husband? I don’t think so.

Perry Cline then appointed James Vance as his first Deputy Sheriff.

Perry Cline’s record for being the youngest man ever elected sheriff was broken a few months after Perry Cline’s death in 1892 when his son, John Sinclair Cline, was elected sheriff at the age of 23. The December, 1892 bond for John S “Sink” Cline, shown here, was signed by the same O/C. Bowles who signed his father’s bond. The first signature on Sink’s bond was his mother, Martha Adkins Cline.

The Kevin Costner movie showed Perry Cline chasing Roseanna McCoy for years. That is a slander of the man who, as the record shows, was devoted to his wife, Martha Adkins Cline. In 1875, Perry Cline sued a man for ten thousand dollars—a fortune in those days—for spreading the tale that he had slept with Cline’s wife. In 1877, Perry Cline sued several men for five thousand dollars because they made too much noise outside his home when he was away, disturbing his wife‘s sleep.

John “Sink” Cline was not only the youngest man ever elected to Pike County’s highest office, he was also the only man ever elected who was facing a murder charge at the time. This photo is the January, 1888 Logan County warrant for the men charged with the murder of Logan County Deputy, Bill Dempsey. John S. Cline is among the men charged.

One may wonder how Logan County identified 24 men from Pike County, even to such detail as saying that George McCoy was the George who lived on Johns Creek. The answer is at the top, where the three people who swore out the warrant are listed. One of them is Nancy L. Hatfield. Nancy was the daughter of Asa Harmon McCoy, married to Johnse Hatfield at the time, and living on Grapevine Creek where the murder happened. Nancy knew them all.

A few months after that warrant issued, the Pike County boys caught a BIG break. Nancy left Johnse and moved in with Frank Phillips on Peter Creek. Without Nancy as a witness, the charges against 18 of the 24 were not pursued further by Logan County, because they had no witness to identify them in court. Of course the charges remained–murder has no statute of limitations–but Logan had no witnesses against most of them. John S. Cline was one of the men against whom no witness other than Nancy was available to testify.

Perry Cline’s political power had two foundations. First, the richest man in the county, Colonel Dils, was his legal guardian. Second, and most important, Perry had virtually unanimous support on Peter Creek. Peter Creek, which was about 80% Republican, voted almost unanimously for the Democrat, Perry Cline.

My Dotson ancestors were Union sympathizers, Union soldiers in the Civil War, and the strongest Republicans on Peter Creek. My Great Grandfather, Ransom Dotson was one of only five Republicans who showed up to vote for U.S. Grant in 1868. In 1878, he named my grandfather after the Democrat sheriff. Squire James L. Dotson, long-time Republican justice of the peace and the richest of the Peter Creek Dotsons, gave a son the full name of the Democrat sheriff—Perry Cline Dotson. When I asked my Grandma Dotson, nee Hatfield, why Grandpa was named Perry after Perry Cline, she had a simple answer: “Perry Cline was a great man.”

Perry Cline is known to feud book readers as a sneaky shyster lawyer, lurking in the shadows. Some say that he was afraid of Devil Anse Hatfield. In fact, it might have been the other way around. Peter Creek had the reputation of being the ‘roughest’ part of Pike County during and for decades after the Civil War. Granny always said that Peter Creek was a good place to get yourself killed.

Perry Cline did not become the political force he was by being a sissy. At the time my grandfather was named for Perry Cline, Cline was facing the charge of Voluntary manslaughter. He had killed a man he was arresting, and the grand jury thought he had used excessive force and indicted the sheriff. Cline stood trial in 1878, and was acquitted.

Perry Cline was the only major character in the feud story who killed a man outside of war before 1880.

In 1878, while serving as Sheriff, Perry Cline and his wife were both charged with assault and battery. Perry pled guilty and the charge against Martha was dismissed.

After I read the book by Virgil Jones in 1952, I asked Uncle Ransom Hatfield, son of Preacher Anse, to whom I delivered the Williamson Daily News from 1952 to 1955, about Perry Cline. He said that Perry Cline was the most feared man in Pike County, even moreso than his foster brother Bad Frank Phillips.

Perry Cline was feared by all, including moonshiners. The Big Sandy News reported on May 31, 1888 that Jailer Cline burst into a warehouse where SEVEN moonshiners were tending their wares and arrested them all.
Uncle Ransom was right, and the feud liars who present him as a cowardly shyster are LIARS!

Ransom said that Perry stood trial for manslaughter while serving as High Sheriff, and was acquitted. He said that, on the way out of the courthouse after being cleared on the manslaughter charge, Perry “Beat Hell out of the main witness against him on the courthouse steps.” He said that Perry’s wife, Martha, helped him whup the man. I wondered if that was just a front porch tale, until I researched the feud story as a college student several years later.
Look at the two incidents reproduced above and you will see that Uncle Ransom was telling the truth. Cline was acquitted of manslaughter on March 15, 1878, and both he and his wife were charged with assault and battery on the 16th.

The feud yarns say that Perry Cline signed his Grapevine land over to Devil Anse because he was afraid of Devil Anse. Testimony by both sides in the Torpin case says that Cline sold that land to Devil Anse. In March, 1877, Perry Cline signed the deed transferring ownership of the Grapevine land. Land that is transferred by deed is NOT stolen

One year after that deed, the record proves that there was NO ill-will between Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield in 1878. Devil Anse lost a lawsuit to G.W. Taylor, and the court ordered the sale of 800 acres owned by Anse on Peter Creek to settle the judgment. That 800 acres, centered on Point Rock Hollow, was the subject of multiple court actions. One can learn a lot of our history by following that acreage through the courts over a half century.

During the Civil War, the Peter Creek Union Home Guards, under Bill Francis and Peter Cline, raided the farms of George (my 3g grandfather) and James Hatfield on Blackberry Creek. George had four sons serving in the Union army at the time–including James–but that made no difference to the Peter Creek raiders. They robbed everyone that could not defend their homes.

After the War, both George and James sued the raiders. George won his suit and collected. When James won his suit a year later, Peter Cline could not pay the judgment and 800 acres that Cline owned on Peter Creek was sold by the court to settle the judgment. James Hatfield bought the land at the courthouse door, and then immediately traded it to Devil Anse Hatfield.

That is the land that Perry Cline, as Sheriff, was ordered to sell in 1878, to pay the judgment against Devil Anse.

Now, we are in 1878, when all the feud stories say that Perry Cline hated Devil Anse because Devil Anse stole Cline’s land in 1877. If that were true, then surely Cline would have enjoyed very much selling Anse’s land at the courthouse door. But Cline did NOT sell the land, even though, as Sheriff,  he was required by law to do so. Instead, he took his brother-in-law, Boney Adkins and a Peter Creek neighbor, Martin Smith, and went across the river to the Logan county home of his friend, Anse Hatfield.

By Cline’s own sworn testimony, we see that he arranged for Martin Smith to co-sign a note for Anse. Then Cline took the note, paid off the judgment, and allowed Devil Anse to keep the land.

Now that’s one heckuva favor to do for someone you hate, ain’t it?

How strong was the friendship between Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield in 1878? Well, that 800 acres that Perry helped Anse to keep when he was supposed to sell it at the courthouse door once belonged to Perry Cline’s brother, Peter Cline!

Then, three years later, Perry Cline’s niece married the son of Devil Anse. Not only did Cline bless the wedding, he signed the $100 bond guaranteeing that the wedding would take place. A hundred bucks was a lot of money in 1881.

Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield were enemies in 1887-8, but that is a whole ‘nother story. It had nothing to do with anything that happened in the 1860’s (the killing of Cline’s brother in law, A.H. McCoy) or in the 1870’s, or anything else connected to a “feud,”. The problems in 1887-8 sprang from what was going on with respect to the valuable coal lands owned by the Hatfields. And it was controlled by people much higher up than Perry Cline.

John Sinclair “Sink” Cline was left out of all the feud books until 2013. Dean King has a lot about John S. Cline in his book, but it is all just fiction, telling you nothing that is real about the man. I know folks are surprised by the affidavit from Nancy McCoy Hatfield, shown above, which listed Sink as one of the murderers of Deputy Dempsey. OTOH, no feud writer before me ever told folks that Sink Cline was elected High Sheriff of Pike County at the age of 23.

There were folks alive on Blackberry Creek when I was growing up who remembered Perry Cline. My Granny was one of them. There were many who remembered John S. Cline. they pronounced his nickname “Sank.” Until I was a college student and researched the records, I thought his name was John SAINT Cline. I mistook the Blackberry pronunciation of “Sink” as “Sank” for the word “Saint.”

I am dedicated to the real history of our ancestors, who have been slandered for a century and a quarter. They are all one-dimensional characters in the feud fables, but the actual record shows that they were complicated, multi-dimensional characters, who behaved as normal people of their time behaved.

Perry Cline was a low-down crooked politician to his enemies. To his friends, like my Great Grandfather, he was, as my Granny told me, “A great man.” I have tried in my books to show the complete Perry Cline. I endeavor to do the same for all our ancestors.

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield-McCoy Feud Hokum Real Hatfield-McCoy History Uncategorized

Crazy Jim Vance: Did They Really Call Him “Crazy?”

Jim Vance is “a raccoon with rabies, a psychopath, a misogynist, and throw in a pinch of Bruce Dern. That’s the recipe.”—Tom Berenger

Otis Rice, a full professor and the West Virginia Historian Laureate, wrote of Jim Vance: “The tall, heavy-set, dark-bearded Vance, himself a later casualty in the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys, had a reputation, even among his rough associates, for ruthlessness and vindictiveness.” The “historian Laureate” gives NO supporting documentation for his wildly inaccurate description of Jim Vance, and he had good reasons not to.  How could Rice present Vance as a ruthless and vindictive criminal when the court records show him holding the offices of constable and justice of the peace in West Virginia and deputy sheriff in Kentucky, with not a single criminal charge–not even a misdemeanor–against him in his entire long life?

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Dean King Hokum

Help Wanted! Devil Anse’s Labor Shortage

  • [I’ve come to believe that manufacturing a feud tale is a bit like making moonshine.  For moonshine, you can take (according to at least one recipe) 8 lbs of crushed corn, 1.5 lbs of malted barley, 5 gallons of water and 1 package of bread yeast and, through a carefully controlled process of mixing, fermenting and distilling, output yourself a small batch of good corn whiskey.  Gold from lead, so to speak.  Our feud tales, from the earliest ones on record to the latest ones published and promoted by the largest of industrial conglomerates, rely on a similar (al)chemical process. You take 2 parts old newspaper stories, 1 part wild tale passed down through a local family, 3 parts unsourced quotes from previously-written books, and 2 parts self-invented detail, mix it carefully together on the page (with no regard whatsoever for the truth) and, viola!, feud tale.  At the very least, your every detail, even the invented ones, become potential ingredients for the next feud book cooked up by the publishing industry and at best you find yourself with a bestseller and possibly even, why the hell not?, a  TV show!  Here’s the thing, though. These concoctions are not good for your brain.  They cloud your judgement.  They make you see things that aren’t true and, if examined for half a second in the cold light of sobriety, are clearly ridiculous.  So, to keep my little analogy going, Thomas is a feud tale revenuer, stalking the backwoods of feud research and feud books to find the source of all this bad hooch, which, with careful blows of the axe, he smashes and leaves in ruins.  Seriously, all of these feud books, with the exception of Altina Waller’s book and Thomas Dotson’s books, should come with a warning label:  Warning! Feud Book.  Claims to historical accuracy lack foundation and may cause blurred vision and permanent memory loss.  Read at your own risk. – RYAN HARDESTY]
  • This forlorn scene might represent Devil Anse Hatfield’s moonshine still in late 1880.   According to Dean King, Anse’s lucrative “likker” trade was in the doldrums due to a labor shortage.  King writes that “Devil Anse’s sons were not keen on  the hard work required,”[i] so the old mountaineer had to look elsewhere.  Even though Devil Anse had dozens of close relatives—brothers, cousins, nephews—living close by, he could find no one willing to do the work associated with tending a still.

How this could be so when Anse had no problem finding forty relatives and neighbors to do the back-breaking labor of timbering in the hills is not divulged.  We must accept it as true, however, because the Boston Globe assures us that Mr. King is a historian.

At a time when, according to King, Anse Hatfield was involved in a furious blood feud with the McCoys, he solved his labor shortage at the still in a most surprising manner; he hired Jim McCoy, the eldest son Ran’l McCoy!

King assures us that a moonshining enterprise was “an endeavor that required absolute faith among participants,”  but he expects us to believe that Devil Anse and Ran’l McCoy’s eldest son were in the moonshine business together in 1880.

That was two years after the hog trial, which, according to King, featured dozens of armed Hatfields and McCoys, turning out to support their respective sides.  It was also the same year that Sam and Paris McCoy killed Bill Staton, Johnse and Roseanna had their fling and Devil Anse took Johnse from Jim’s brothers at gunpoint.  It was within a few weeks of the time when, according to King, more than a hundred armed McCoys invaded Anse’s county seat of Logan.

King does not tell us whether Jim came to work at the still the morning after Devil Anse stripped his brothers of their prisoner.  Maybe Jim was actually living in the home of Devil Anse at the time, in order to avoid the commute of two hours every morning and evening by horseback from Pond Creek to Grapevine.  King doesn’t say, so we will just have to guess.

The very idea that anyone — much less someone as intelligent and cautious as Devil Anse Hatfield — would allow a non-kinsman out-of-state outsider to even look at his still is preposterous.  From the day that Lincoln signed the law in 1862, making the distilling of untaxed liquor a federal offense, until today, no operator of such a still would ever do such a thing.  King repeats at least three more times the ludicrous claim that Devil Anse, a member of one of the largest families in the entire Valley, had such a shortage of willing workers among his kin that he had to employ an out-of-state McCoy at his still.

Any reader gullible enough to swallow this yarn will probably believe the dozens of even taller tales coming later in this “True Story” of the Hatfield and McCoy feud.

 


[i] King, Dean, The Feud, 67

[ii] Ibid.

[iii] ibid