Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Sheep-Killing dogs and Deadly Buzzard Dung

What would be considered hyperbole in a novel is often history in the feud stories.

Otis Rice obviously considers the blood and brain spattered ground on the riverbank where the three sons of Ran’l McCoy were executed to be insufficiently gory without embellishment.  Rice says that the “bullet-riddled bodies” were “swinging from the bushes.” (p.28) Then he makes it far more repugnant to the reader’s senses by introducing the carcasses and bones of dead dogs.

It is bad enough to execute men among heaps of dog carcasses, but these were dogs of distinctly inferior character. These were sheep-killing dogs!

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Do Historians Write History?

The Vances, Abner (My 4th great grandfather) and James, are grossly misrepresented in the feud yarns, and that includes the book by Professor Otis Rice.  If the outrageous lies of popular novelists like Lisa Alther and Dean King were all we had to overcome, it would be a piece of cake. Unfortunately, with the Vances—and much of the rest of the story– we also have a problem with the historians.

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Perry Cline–The Man–Hatfield and McCoy Feud

The two most misrepresented of all the feud characters are James Vance, whom we covered in an earlier post, and Perry A. Cline.

The treatment of Perry Cline by the feud writers is as atrocious as is that of Jim Vance. As in the case of Vance, the picture of Cline painted by the yarn-spinners is a mixture of ignorance and lies.  The historical Perry Cline was far more different from the one the feud writers portray than Ronan Vibert is from the real Perry Cline.

PACreal

There is a lot of Cline history that does not appear in the feud stories. Here is a small part of it.

This photo is a Pike County Court document from December, 1874, showing Perry Cline becoming Sheriff of Pike County, at the age of 25. His bond was signed by the two wealthiest men in the county, O.C. Bowles and John Dils. Dils and Bowles were Republicans, and Cline was a Democrat. Dils was also foster father to Perry Cline.

Click the thumbnails to expand them.

I know it will shock people who know nothing but what they have read in the feud tales, but the third signer of Perry Cline’s bond was none other than his close friend, James Vance. The feud yarns tell us that Perry Cline thought that James Vance murdered Cline’s brother-in-law, Asa Harmon McCoy in 1865. This record shows that Perry Cline and James Vance were the closest of friends ten years later. Does any sentient human being think that Perry Cline had a man sign his sheriff’s bond whom he thought had murdered his sister’s husband? I don’t think so.

Perry Cline then appointed James Vance as his first Deputy Sheriff.

Perry Cline’s record for being the youngest man ever elected sheriff was broken a few months after Perry Cline’s death in 1892 when his son, John Sinclair Cline, was elected sheriff at the age of 23. The December, 1892 bond for John S “Sink” Cline, shown here, was signed by the same O/C. Bowles who signed his father’s bond. The first signature on Sink’s bond was his mother, Martha Adkins Cline.

The Kevin Costner movie showed Perry Cline chasing Roseanna McCoy for years. That is a slander of the man who, as the record shows, was devoted to his wife, Martha Adkins Cline. In 1875, Perry Cline sued a man for ten thousand dollars—a fortune in those days—for spreading the tale that he had slept with Cline’s wife. In 1877, Perry Cline sued several men for five thousand dollars because they made too much noise outside his home when he was away, disturbing his wife‘s sleep.

John “Sink” Cline was not only the youngest man ever elected to Pike County’s highest office, he was also the only man ever elected who was facing a murder charge at the time. This photo is the January, 1888 Logan County warrant for the men charged with the murder of Logan County Deputy, Bill Dempsey. John S. Cline is among the men charged.

One may wonder how Logan County identified 24 men from Pike County, even to such detail as saying that George McCoy was the George who lived on Johns Creek. The answer is at the top, where the three people who swore out the warrant are listed. One of them is Nancy L. Hatfield. Nancy was the daughter of Asa Harmon McCoy, married to Johnse Hatfield at the time, and living on Grapevine Creek where the murder happened. Nancy knew them all.

A few months after that warrant issued, the Pike County boys caught a BIG break. Nancy left Johnse and moved in with Frank Phillips on Peter Creek. Without Nancy as a witness, the charges against 18 of the 24 were not pursued further by Logan County, because they had no witness to identify them in court. Of course the charges remained–murder has no statute of limitations–but Logan had no witnesses against most of them. John S. Cline was one of the men against whom no witness other than Nancy was available to testify.

Perry Cline’s political power had two foundations. First, the richest man in the county, Colonel Dils, was his legal guardian. Second, and most important, Perry had virtually unanimous support on Peter Creek. Peter Creek, which was about 80% Republican, voted almost unanimously for the Democrat, Perry Cline.

My Dotson ancestors were Union sympathizers, Union soldiers in the Civil War, and the strongest Republicans on Peter Creek. My Great Grandfather, Ransom Dotson was one of only five Republicans who showed up to vote for U.S. Grant in 1868. In 1878, he named my grandfather after the Democrat sheriff. Squire James L. Dotson, long-time Republican justice of the peace and the richest of the Peter Creek Dotsons, gave a son the full name of the Democrat sheriff—Perry Cline Dotson. When I asked my Grandma Dotson, nee Hatfield, why Grandpa was named Perry after Perry Cline, she had a simple answer: “Perry Cline was a great man.”

Perry Cline is known to feud book readers as a sneaky shyster lawyer, lurking in the shadows. Some say that he was afraid of Devil Anse Hatfield. In fact, it might have been the other way around. Peter Creek had the reputation of being the ‘roughest’ part of Pike County during and for decades after the Civil War. Granny always said that Peter Creek was a good place to get yourself killed.

Perry Cline did not become the political force he was by being a sissy. At the time my grandfather was named for Perry Cline, Cline was facing the charge of Voluntary manslaughter. He had killed a man he was arresting, and the grand jury thought he had used excessive force and indicted the sheriff. Cline stood trial in 1878, and was acquitted.

Perry Cline was the only major character in the feud story who killed a man outside of war before 1880.

In 1878, while serving as Sheriff, Perry Cline and his wife were both charged with assault and battery. Perry pled guilty and the charge against Martha was dismissed.

After I read the book by Virgil Jones in 1952, I asked Uncle Ransom Hatfield, son of Preacher Anse, to whom I delivered the Williamson Daily News from 1952 to 1955, about Perry Cline. He said that Perry Cline was the most feared man in Pike County, even moreso than his foster brother Bad Frank Phillips.

Perry Cline was feared by all, including moonshiners. The Big Sandy News reported on May 31, 1888 that Jailer Cline burst into a warehouse where SEVEN moonshiners were tending their wares and arrested them all.
Uncle Ransom was right, and the feud liars who present him as a cowardly shyster are LIARS!

Ransom said that Perry stood trial for manslaughter while serving as High Sheriff, and was acquitted. He said that, on the way out of the courthouse after being cleared on the manslaughter charge, Perry “Beat Hell out of the main witness against him on the courthouse steps.” He said that Perry’s wife, Martha, helped him whup the man. I wondered if that was just a front porch tale, until I researched the feud story as a college student several years later.
Look at the two incidents reproduced above and you will see that Uncle Ransom was telling the truth. Cline was acquitted of manslaughter on March 15, 1878, and both he and his wife were charged with assault and battery on the 16th.

The feud yarns say that Perry Cline signed his Grapevine land over to Devil Anse because he was afraid of Devil Anse. Testimony by both sides in the Torpin case says that Cline sold that land to Devil Anse. In March, 1877, Perry Cline signed the deed transferring ownership of the Grapevine land. Land that is transferred by deed is NOT stolen

One year after that deed, the record proves that there was NO ill-will between Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield in 1878. Devil Anse lost a lawsuit to G.W. Taylor, and the court ordered the sale of 800 acres owned by Anse on Peter Creek to settle the judgment. That 800 acres, centered on Point Rock Hollow, was the subject of multiple court actions. One can learn a lot of our history by following that acreage through the courts over a half century.

During the Civil War, the Peter Creek Union Home Guards, under Bill Francis and Peter Cline, raided the farms of George (my 3g grandfather) and James Hatfield on Blackberry Creek. George had four sons serving in the Union army at the time–including James–but that made no difference to the Peter Creek raiders. They robbed everyone that could not defend their homes.

After the War, both George and James sued the raiders. George won his suit and collected. When James won his suit a year later, Peter Cline could not pay the judgment and 800 acres that Cline owned on Peter Creek was sold by the court to settle the judgment. James Hatfield bought the land at the courthouse door, and then immediately traded it to Devil Anse Hatfield.

That is the land that Perry Cline, as Sheriff, was ordered to sell in 1878, to pay the judgment against Devil Anse.

Now, we are in 1878, when all the feud stories say that Perry Cline hated Devil Anse because Devil Anse stole Cline’s land in 1877. If that were true, then surely Cline would have enjoyed very much selling Anse’s land at the courthouse door. But Cline did NOT sell the land, even though, as Sheriff,  he was required by law to do so. Instead, he took his brother-in-law, Boney Adkins and a Peter Creek neighbor, Martin Smith, and went across the river to the Logan county home of his friend, Anse Hatfield.

By Cline’s own sworn testimony, we see that he arranged for Martin Smith to co-sign a note for Anse. Then Cline took the note, paid off the judgment, and allowed Devil Anse to keep the land.

Now that’s one heckuva favor to do for someone you hate, ain’t it?

How strong was the friendship between Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield in 1878? Well, that 800 acres that Perry helped Anse to keep when he was supposed to sell it at the courthouse door once belonged to Perry Cline’s brother, Peter Cline!

Then, three years later, Perry Cline’s niece married the son of Devil Anse. Not only did Cline bless the wedding, he signed the $100 bond guaranteeing that the wedding would take place. A hundred bucks was a lot of money in 1881.

Perry Cline and Anse Hatfield were enemies in 1887-8, but that is a whole ‘nother story. It had nothing to do with anything that happened in the 1860’s (the killing of Cline’s brother in law, A.H. McCoy) or in the 1870’s, or anything else connected to a “feud,”. The problems in 1887-8 sprang from what was going on with respect to the valuable coal lands owned by the Hatfields. And it was controlled by people much higher up than Perry Cline.

John Sinclair “Sink” Cline was left out of all the feud books until 2013. Dean King has a lot about John S. Cline in his book, but it is all just fiction, telling you nothing that is real about the man. I know folks are surprised by the affidavit from Nancy McCoy Hatfield, shown above, which listed Sink as one of the murderers of Deputy Dempsey. OTOH, no feud writer before me ever told folks that Sink Cline was elected High Sheriff of Pike County at the age of 23.

There were folks alive on Blackberry Creek when I was growing up who remembered Perry Cline. My Granny was one of them. There were many who remembered John S. Cline. they pronounced his nickname “Sank.” Until I was a college student and researched the records, I thought his name was John SAINT Cline. I mistook the Blackberry pronunciation of “Sink” as “Sank” for the word “Saint.”

I am dedicated to the real history of our ancestors, who have been slandered for a century and a quarter. They are all one-dimensional characters in the feud fables, but the actual record shows that they were complicated, multi-dimensional characters, who behaved as normal people of their time behaved.

Perry Cline was a low-down crooked politician to his enemies. To his friends, like my Great Grandfather, he was, as my Granny told me, “A great man.” I have tried in my books to show the complete Perry Cline. I endeavor to do the same for all our ancestors.

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books Uncategorized

Where’s All the Dead Hatfields?

Uncle Ransom Hatfield lived near the lower end of my paper route back in 1952-55.  He lived almost his entire life in the home place of his father, Preacher Anse Hatfield, which was where the infamous “hog trial” took place in 1878, and where Ellison Hatfield was killed on Election Day, 1882.

Uncle Ransom was interviewed by almost all the writers who wrote before he died in 1956. He detested all the books, which he said were “mostly bull-shit.” This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Dean King Hokum Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Let’s Talk About the “Hog Trial”

Let’s talk about the infamous “hog trial,” which is said to have been conducted in the front parlor of the  house seen here.  I have been in that room many times, and talked at great length with the man seen in the photo, Uncle Ransom Hatfield, who lived there all his life. He was the son of Preacher Anderson Hatfield, who was my great-great-grandfather, on both sides. I delivered the Williamson Daily news to Uncle Ransom from 1952-55, and talked with him at least once a week about “the feud.”

The first question is: Was there a hog trial, or is it just another “feud fable?”

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

The Reporters Who Made Devil Anse Famous

The light bulb shown here was invented by a man whose name was Theron Clark Crawford.  Crawford was also  the co-inventor of something much more lasting than was his light bulb—The Hatfield and McCoy Feud!

crawford

Crawford visited Logan, West Virginia in 1888.  He also penetrated the wilds of Island Creek for a visit with Devil Anse Hatfield.

This essay, in its entirety, can be read in my book, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Feud Tales.”  https://www.amazon.com/dp/1977716814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511238586&sr=1-1&keywords=Lies%2C+Damned+Lies%2C+and+Feud+Tales


[i] Crawford, T. C., An American Vendetta, 7,8.

[ii] Crawford, 16.

[iii] Crawford, 3.

[iv] Crawford, 65.

[v] Crawford, 81.

[vi] Crawford, 9.

[vii] Spears, John R., A Mountain Feud, 19-20.

[viii] Spears, 28

[ix] Spears, 14.

Categories
Hatfield & McCoy Hokum in Books

Blood-thirsty and Stupid—and They Couldn’t Shoot Straight

Blood-thirsty and Stupid—and They Couldn’t Shoot Straight

 

[One of the things that has always amazed me about Thomas is his ability to zero in on the absurdities of the many feud tales.  I had read many of these stories, in book after book, for years, and never thought to question them.  They are presented as fact, with enough convincing detail to make them seem real.  Thomas, however, approaches these tales with impeccable logic coupled with an encyclopedic knowledge of feud-related history.  A major element in Thomas’s work involves whittling away at the accepted body of feud-tales, using actual court records and other documents to set the record straight.  Thomas writes frequently about how the standard story of the feud has grown over the years as outside writers, from John Spears to Virgil Carrington Jones to Dean King, freely add fictional material into the middle of historical events until the two are indistinguishable to the average reader.  One of the main contributions to feud history that Thomas has made, in my opinion, is the way he has systematically dismantled 120 years of feud fiction, downsizing the tall tales passing themselves off as historical events, so that the real history of these real people can at long last be seen. – RH]

Three things which appear repeatedly in Dean King’s supersized feud story are bloodlust, stupidity and poor marksmanship.  If, as King says, Devil Anse was seeking to kill Ran’l McCoy during 1883-1887, he was blood-thirsty. His execution of the three McCoys who killed his brother would have satiated the desire for revenge for anyone who was not a psychopathic killer.  If Devil Anse did not realize that he could send just about any member of his family over the age of ten to lurk in the edge of the woods surrounding the home of Ran’l McCoy, and pick off the old man as he went about his daily chores, then Devil Anse was stupid.

Under oath in Johnse Hatfield’s trial, Jim McCoy was asked: When did the trouble between the two families start?”

Jim answered: “It started at the 1882 election.” Nothing about his uncle Asa Harmon being murdered by Hatfields in 1865, nothing about his uncle having a pig stolen in 1878, and nothing about his sister being impregnated and abandoned by Johnse in 1880.

Then the prosecutor asked Jim what happened between the 1882 election events and the New Yeaar’s raid on his father’s home. Jim McCoy, with the strongest possible motive to make the ‘feud’ as big and bloody as possible, said: “We tried to get them arrested, but we NEVER had ANY trouble.” There is a plethora of documentary evidence for the things Jim McCoy swore happened, but there is absolutely NO historical evidence for the dozens of “feud events” that appear in the feud tales before 1882 and during the five years between 1882 and December of 1887. With no real evidence for their yarns, and no dead bodies, the feud writers are forced to present the Hatfields as poor marksmen. Men who shot squirrels out of the tops of tall trees with a .22 rifle are said to be unable to score a torso hit with a high-powered Winchester from the free throw line to the basket.

As the only documented death between August 9, 1882 and January 1, 1888 was the killing of Jeff McCoy in September, 1886, with Perry Cline telling the Governor that Tom Wallace–NOT any Hatfield–killed his nephew Jeff, all the “battles” conjured up by King for his fantastic yarn had to feature poor marksmanship, because there were NO corpses or court records to back up King’s yarns.

Thus King has Cap Hatfield firing several shots from a Winchester rifle at Jeff McCoy while McCoy was swimming across a river King says was only forty feet wide (it’s actually about three times that wide), missing him every time.  Then King has a seven-man hit squad of mountain hunters hurling a fusillade of bullets at three men riding abreast from an ambush located only thirty feet off the road, and succeeding only in hitting one man in the knee and another in the shoulder.  Like Glenn Campbell in “True Grit,” they did manage to kill the horses.

King’s poor marksmanship on the part of the Hatfields includes a tale of Cap Hatfield mistaking one of his Hatfield cousins for Ran’l McCoy, at a distance of less than seventy yards.  At this distance, a mountain hunter should be able to hit either coat button he aimed at, but all Cap could manage was another knee-capping. After reading of these repeated knee shootings, one begins to wonder if the Cosa Nostra got its “kneecapping” thing from Cap Hatfield.

King is just the latest in a long line of feud story-tellers who feature poor marksmanship on the part of the Hatfields.  G. Elliott Hatfield, in his 1976 book, The Hatfields, had Elias Hatfield shooting six times at Pharmer McCoy, with the gun so close to McCoy’s face that every shot powder-burned McCoy’s face, yet he missed every time. To top it off, Elias shot six times with a revolver that had only five live cartridges in the cylinder!

An interesting twist to King’s tale of sorry marksmanship on the part of Devil Anse and his crew is that the poor shooting was strictly a daytime phenomenon. In King’s yarn, the Hatfield gang fired hundreds of shots at dozens of men in daylight, with Jeff McCoy being the only fatality.  The same gang shot at six McCoys during the dark of night, and killed five of them. Go figure.